data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ac59/9ac597ab94b5f0c0dc36d8e4e276d51a316c893a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a650/2a650b0e39f7b04a57a4fa3673bb0929ee504a56" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a019/1a019574034c28345abe361cb77f1793e42f9dc9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71e26/71e26ff98e8325d60379cc00d25053200cec76a3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2093/f209396bd651ae87dbdeb84673c258ce679c04a8" alt=""
The client’s trademark was a famous mark in respect of automatic vending machines in US. To add, we conducted various searches in the Internet and found abundance of information on automatic vending machines bearing the mark in Vietnam. As such, it could be established that (i) the client had run a business concerning automatic vending machines bearing the mark in Vietnam and (ii) the adverse party had been aware of the client’s trademark and registered the trademark for automatic vending machines related services in Class 35 in Vietnam in bad faith.
In Vietnam, the regulations for invalidating a trademark registration are governed by the Law on Intellectual Property (IP Law) of Vietnam, primarily under the Law on Intellectual Property (as amended and supplemented by other laws). The main provisions related to the invalidation of a trademark registration are found in Articles 95 and 96.
Wide Use of a Trademark
Proving the wide use of a trademark in Vietnam is essential for various purposes, such as defending against a cancellation action for non-use, establishing well-known status, or proving priority over a conflicting trademark registration. The process involves demonstrating that the trademark has been continuously and extensively used in commerce in Vietnam, gaining a certain level of reputation and recognition among relevant consumers. The steps to prove wide use of a trademark in Vietnam
Contexts Where Proving Wide Use is Crucial
At that time, Vietnam IP Law and its by-law documents did not lay down regulations on what act is considered bad faith/dishonesty in registering a trademark in Vietnam. Hence, the interpretation of bad faith/dishonesty as a ground for trademark invalidation depended on IP Vietnam on case-by-case basis. The critical factors in demonstrating a bad faith were commonly accepted by IP Vietnam through weight of evidence around “the registrant is aware of genuine holder’s trademark” as well as “relationship” between the registrant and the righteous trademark holder manifested by investment, license or contract relation.
Further, wide use of a mark in foreign countries (other than Vietnam) might support a trademark invalidation action in Vietnam, but not a determinant factor. Under Article 74.2g of the Intellectual Property Law of Vietnam (Wide-use ground): “Signs should be refused for trademark protection in Vietnam if they are] Signs identical with or confusingly similar to another person’s mark which has been widely used and recognized for similar or identical goods or services before the filing date or the priority date, as applicable.”. Therefore, to ascertain chance of success in winning a trademark invalidation action, it is critically important to evidence wide-use status of the client’s mark in commerce in Vietnam before the filing date of the mark filed by the adverse party.
On the mentioned ground, the client submitted to IP Vietnam evidence proving the wide-use of the client’s mark, which included, but not limited to, the following information/documents:
The chance of success in opposition depended much on abundance and strength of evidence on the wide-use status. Under the trademark practice of Vietnam, all evidence of wide-use status of a trademark should be incorporated in a Declaration, which must be notarized by the notary public and be submitted to IP Vietnam in support to the wide-use/well-known status argument. The annex/exhibits to the Declaration were not required to be notarized.
Affidavit or Declaration of Use
A formal affidavit or declaration detailing the use of a trademark in Vietnam is a sworn statement made by a representative of the trademark owner (such as the CEO, Marketing Manager, or Legal Counsel) affirming the continuous and extensive use of the trademark in Vietnam. This document is often notarized and serves as evidence in legal proceedings, such as defending against a non-use cancellation action or establishing a trademark as well-known.
Here is a basic template outlining the key elements to include in the affidavit or declaration:
[Company Letterhead, if available]
AFFIDAVIT OF USE OF TRADEMARK
1. INTRODUCTION
I, [Name], of [Position] at [Company Name], having its registered office at [Company Address], being duly sworn, do hereby declare and state as follows:
Declarant Information:
I am the [Position] of [Company Name] (“the Company”), a company duly organized and existing under the laws of [Country], with its principal place of business at [Company Address].
Authority to Make the Declaration:
I am duly authorized to make this affidavit on behalf of the Company and have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein.
2. DETAILS OF THE TRADEMARK
Trademark Information:
The Company is the owner of the trademark “[Trademark Name]” (the “Trademark”), registered under Registration No. [Registration Number] with the National Office of Intellectual Property of Vietnam (NOIP) on [Registration Date] for goods/services in Class(es) [List Class Numbers].
3. EVIDENCE OF USE
Duration of Use:
The Trademark has been continuously and extensively used in Vietnam since [First Date of Use in Vietnam] for the goods/services covered by the registration.
Nature of Use:
The Trademark is prominently used on the following goods/services: [Description of Goods/Services]. The Trademark is displayed on product packaging, promotional materials, advertising campaigns, and digital platforms, including websites and social media channels.
Geographical Scope of Use:
The Trademark has been used in various regions of Vietnam, including [List Specific Cities or Regions], where the Company’s products/services are distributed and sold.
Extent of Use:
The following evidence illustrates the extent of the use of the Trademark:
The Company has invested heavily in advertising and promoting the Trademark in Vietnam, with a total advertising expenditure of [Amount] from [Year] to [Year].
Market Position and Consumer Recognition:
Based on the market surveys and consumer research conducted by [Research Firm, if any], the Trademark has attained significant recognition among the relevant consumer groups in Vietnam. A copy of the survey report is attached as Exhibit E.
Affirmation:
Based on the above evidence and facts, I affirm that the Trademark “[Trademark Name]” has been widely used in commerce in Vietnam and enjoys substantial goodwill and recognition among consumers in the relevant market.
4. SIGNATURE AND NOTARIZATION
Signature and Date:
I declare under the penalties of perjury under the laws of Vietnam that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
Date: [Date of Declaration]
Signature: [Signature of Declarant]
Name: [Name of Declarant]
Position: [Position]
Company: [Company Name]
Notarization:
[This section should be completed by a notary public or another competent authority in accordance with the local legal requirements.]
Additional Notes:
For further information, please do not hesitate to contact us at bud-prairie@bud-prairie.com.
A trademark registration may be invalidated for several reasons. The process of invalidating a trademark—sometimes referred to as “cancellation”—typically involves proving that the trademark was improperly granted or that circumstances have changed that make the registration invalid. Here are some common grounds for invalidating a trademark registration:
Invalidating a trademark typically involves legal proceedings before a trademark office or a court, depending on the jurisdiction and the grounds for invalidation.
The invalidation of a trademark registration can have significant consequences for businesses and individuals. Here are the key takeaways for understanding invalidation:
1. Retroactive Effect:
When a trademark registration is invalidated, it is considered void from the date of registration. This means that the trademark is treated as if it were never legally protected from the beginning.
The owner loses all exclusive rights to the trademark, including any legal recourse for infringement that may have occurred during the period of registration.
2. Grounds for Invalidation:
Lack of Distinctiveness: If the trademark is not distinctive enough to differentiate the goods or services of one party from those of another.
Prior Rights: If another party can prove they have prior rights to a similar or identical trademark for the same or similar goods/services.
Misrepresentation or Fraud: If the registration was obtained through false information or fraudulent claims.
Genericism: If a trademark has become generic and is now used as a common term for a type of product or service.
Violation of Public Policy: If the trademark is deemed offensive, deceptive, or contrary to public policy or law.
Bad Faith: If the registration was done in bad faith, such as to block a competitor unjustly.
3. Legal Proceedings:
Invalidation is generally pursued through legal proceedings, either before a trademark office or in a court. It often involves a third party filing a formal request for invalidation and providing evidence to support their claim.
The process can be complex and requires thorough documentation and legal argumentation to establish the grounds for invalidation.
4. Impact on Businesses:
Losing a trademark through invalidation can have serious implications for businesses, including the loss of brand recognition, goodwill, and legal protection against infringement.
Businesses may have to rebrand or cease using certain trademarks if they are invalidated, which can result in substantial costs.
5. Third-Party Challenges:
Competitors or other interested parties can challenge the validity of a trademark if they believe it does not meet the necessary legal criteria for registration.
Companies should be vigilant about monitoring the trademark registrations of competitors and be prepared to challenge any that infringe upon their own rights or are improperly granted.
6. Risk Mitigation:
To avoid the risk of invalidation, it is crucial for trademark applicants to conduct thorough trademark searches before filing to ensure that their proposed mark is distinctive, does not infringe on existing rights, and complies with legal standards.
Proper legal guidance and adherence to trademark laws can help mitigate the risk of a trademark being invalidated.
7. Not Always the End of the Road:
In some cases, even if a trademark registration is invalidated, the owner may still have some rights under common law if the mark has been used in commerce and has acquired distinctiveness in a specific region or market.
Reapplication or registration of a modified trademark may be possible, depending on the circumstances and the reasons for invalidation.
Invalidation of a trademark registration can have profound and far-reaching effects on a brand’s legal standing and business operations. Understanding the grounds, consequences, and potential defenses against invalidation is critical for businesses to safeguard their trademarks and overall brand identity.
Invalidation and termination of a trademark registration are two different legal processes, each with its own implications for the status of a trademark. Here’s a breakdown of the differences:
Invalidation refers to the legal process by which a trademark registration is declared invalid from the beginning, as if it were never registered. This process usually occurs when a third party successfully challenges the validity of the registration on specific grounds.
Termination (or cancellation) of a trademark registration involves ending the legal protection of a trademark from a specific point onward. Termination generally occurs for reasons related to the use (or non-use) of the trademark after its registration.
Aspect | Invalidation | Termination (Cancellation) |
---|---|---|
Effect | Trademark is void from the start, as if never registered. | Trademark protection ends from the date of termination onward. |
Grounds | Issues related to the validity of the registration itself. | Issues related to non-use, failure to renew, or abandonment. |
Process | Legal challenge by a third party or authority. | Can be initiated by owner or third party; may involve non-use. |
Result | All rights associated with the registration are lost retroactively. | Rights are lost from the termination date forward; some common law rights may remain. |
Both processes serve to remove trademark protections, but invalidation nullifies the registration from the beginning, whereas termination removes protection from a specific point in time going forward.
Expert & Experienced Team
Cost-Effective & Friendly Solutions
State-of-the-Art Technologies
Client-Oriented Approach
Network of 280+ Lawyers
Responsiveness & Flexibility